
AS DELIVERED
Thank you, Madame Chairperson.
We thank the Secretary General for his helpful report (A/65/96) compiling the written comments of States on the future status of the draft articles.
As we explained in our recent written submission, the United States continues to believe that the draft articles are most valuable in their present form, and that future action with regard to the articles is neither necessary nor desirable.
We believe there is little to be gained in terms of additional authority or clarity through the negotiation of a convention. As evidenced by the Secretary General’s report (A/65/76) on the application of the draft articles by international courts and tribunals, the draft articles already have tremendous influence and importance. Likewise for States and other international actors, the draft articles have proven to be a useful guide both on what the law is and on how the law might be progressively developed.
However, we share the concern expressed by a number of States in their written comments that the process of negotiating a convention could risk undermining the very important work undertaken by the Commission over several decades, particularly if the resulting convention deviated from important existing rules or did not enjoy widespread acceptance. We believe the better course is to allow the draft articles to guide and settle the continuing development of the customary international law of state responsibility.
Thank you, Madame Chairperson.
###
This site is managed by U.S. Mission to the United Nations in New York City and the Bureau of Public Affairs in Washington, DC. External links to other Internet sites should not be construed as an endorsement of the views or privacy policies contained therein.